Heathlands Petition Ignored by MBC

09 / 11 / 25

On 14 October, we presented our petition to Maidstone Councilโ€™s Cabinet meeting, calling for the ๐—›๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ต๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐˜€ ๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—— ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐˜‚๐—ป๐˜๐—ถ๐—น ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐˜† ๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜€๐˜‚๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—น๐˜† ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ฑ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ฑ. Over 1,500 residents signed, demanding transparency and accountability โ€” yet our voices have been completely dismissed.

Our petition highlighted that:

  • No transport modelling has been carried out for this massive new development.
  • Thereโ€™s still no certainty about the new railway station โ€” a fundamental piece of the plan.
  • Proper meaningful engagement still needed to be had with Lenham Parish Council and SOHL

๐——๐—ฒ๐˜€๐—ฝ๐—ถ๐˜๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ถ๐˜€, ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—–๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜ ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜€ ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ผ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€ ๐—ฎ๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ, ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ผ๐˜„๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐˜‚๐˜๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐˜ ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—น๐—ผ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ณ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜„๐˜€.

Our petition received no acknowledgment โ€” not from the Leader, Cllr Stuart Jeffery, nor from any Cabinet member. SOHL lodged a formal complaint, but an internal โ€œkangaroo courtโ€ of council officers concluded that because the petition was ๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ข๐˜จ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ๐˜ข, it was โ€œconsideredโ€. Thatโ€™s bureaucracy over democracy.

To make matters worse, Cabinet decided to proceed with the public consultation โ€” ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด on ๐Ÿฏ ๐—ก๐—ผ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ โ€” as if none of this mattered.

At least under the former Conservative administration, petitions were debated. We have never known a council to dismiss residentsโ€™ voices so readily.

This is not good governance. This is not transparency.

Itโ€™s time Maidstone Borough Council started listening to the people it serves.